The term "artifact" in archeology has two interpretations. One of them, the most popular, says that an artifact is any item that has been subjected to human influence and found during excavations.
All kinds of utensils and antique jewelry, tools and remains of ancient dwellings - all these are artifacts on which our history was built. Of course, the theory of the origin of man grew not only on historical finds. Thanks to Darwin and his theories, all sorts of … scientists (biologists, archaeologists and others like them) built a relatively logical story of how monkeys became intelligent people. Recently, however, a huge number of artifacts have been made (or declassified) that either do not fit into the teachings of Darwinism, or completely refute it. From this point of view, the second meaning of the term "artifact" becomes clearer: it is a phenomenon, object or process, the appearance of which is currently impossible for natural reasons. Unclear? Well, let's look at examples.
Mysteries of history. Artifacts that refute Darwin's theory
So, Darwinism for a long timewas the only (other than religious) official theory. According to it, about 400-250 thousand years ago, people learned how to make digging sticks and other primitive tools. It seemed that all the artifacts found confirmed this theory. But … In South Africa, miners accidentally discovered several spheres while working. Some of them are all-metal, corrugated, round, interspersed with white matter unknown to science. Others are shaped like discs, the middle of which is filled with a spongy material. Scientists using the latest techniques have determined the age of the balls: about 3 billion (!!!) years. Balls and spheres - an artifact. This is undeniable. But they point out that the theory of Darwinism, on which our science is built, does not correspond to reality. In other words, from the point of view of traditional science, these objects cannot exist, because man had not yet appeared in those days. But spheres do exist. Moreover, they still continue to be mined from the rocks near the city of Klerksdorp. Hundreds of stone balls are found around the world (from 200 BC to 1500 AD). Dinosaur-painted Ica stones found in Peru. And in India there is a metal pillar (1600 years old) made of iron of a purity that modern science cannot achieve.
Thousands of such artifacts, which cannot be, from the point of view of modern science, are found. All of them belong to those times when, according to Darwinists, man either did not exist at all, or he was not much different from monkeys. Giant skulls, the skeleton of a horse about 3meters, found in Kabarda, the remains of people with elongated heads - all this makes us think: have we simplified the story of our birth too much by believing Darwin?
Shocking Artifact: It's Not a Fiction
There are not only inexplicable, but also literally shocking artifacts. So, during excavations in Baghdad, a battery was found, which was born 2000 years earlier than Volt invented it. In California, geologists have discovered a spark plug that is 500,000 years old. Naturally, both the battery and the candle are made of other materials that are unusual for us. But the principle is the same! And then there are gold chains and watches found deep in the coal seams, remains of unknown but complex instruments dating back millions of years, and hundreds of other unexpected items. Each such discovery is an artifact that makes one think that humanity developed in a completely different way from what Darwin imagined.
