Many unflattering characteristics in the heat of discussion are involuntarily vented at the opponent. And there comes an awkward moment when you have to decide: was it a malicious insult or a subconscious reference to the lexicon in search of the most appropriate term? The sonorous and capacious definition of "zhmot" is one of the words that can be interpreted differently in different circles. In some cases, it will go unnoticed, in others it will serve as a pretext for a serious conflict.
How did the concept come about?
The answer is on the surface, just a little digging in dictionaries is enough. Linguists trace a direct connection with the verb "squeeze" in the meanings:
- limit your spending;
- save.
The single original Proto-Slavic root zeti can be found in the vastness of Eastern Europe in various variations. And they all point to a densely compressed substance, the fundamental principle:
- matter in philosophy;
- clod of earth, snow, etc.
Hints on the exact meaning of the word "measuring" give related definitions from the Greek "abundant, take", Norwegian "crush", as well as Lithuanian"node". It invariably implies the purposeful limitation of something in space or acquisitiveness, accumulation and arrangement of we alth.
How is it used by contemporaries?
Even the children of the beginning of the 21st century knew perfectly well that huddling is bad! Such behavior is inherent in greedy people who do not want to share sweets with others, let them play on a computer or with a car model. Hence the negative perception of the concept under study, which breaks down into meanings:
- greedy person;
- mean;
- mean.
It is impossible to hear a word in small talk, because it has a colloquial character with a touch of disdain. The speaker seems to be trying to belittle the merits of the interlocutor, bringing to the fore unwillingness to share anything. The usual statement of fact, attempts to hurt or insult are possible.
Is that appropriate to say?
Be very careful with your wording. If a person earns a lot and does not need money, but in a cafe he never pays for his comrades, saves in small things, this is a classic miser. However, to say this in person is a violation of all conceivable norms of etiquette. It is indecent to count other people's money, as well as to try to direct it to your own needs against the will of the owner of the wallet.
The epithet will be appropriate in a private conversation as a value judgment of a third person, as well as in a joking manner, if you want to tease a friend. In other situations, try to remain silent if you do not want the development of a conflict or a reciprocal accusation.in excessive extravagance, squandering.
