Let's think - flying saucers, is this a real phenomenon from the point of view of academic science, and is there any reasonable explanation for such a phenomenon? First, let's remember what everyone has known for a long time. Academic science proves the fact that any movement must be preceded by a repulsion.
Otherwise, this fact is also called the "reference" movement, in which the mass of a moving body, including those with rotational motion, is repelled from another mass.
In closed systems, the sum of all external forces always remains the same. Simply put, the center of any movement that occurs on the Earth and within its explored orbits is the very center of the globe. All objects and any vehicles known to the world today are subject to this law.
The fundamental laws on which all the interaction of masses in a closed space, which is the Earth, are based, are Newton's three laws, namely: the law of conservation of energy, the law of momentum and the law of moments of impulses. Atcorrect interpretation of these laws, one cannot conclude that the center of mass
closed space, in which rotational movement occurs, remains constant.
Are there alternative kinetic energy of rotational movement, which is not based on the action of external forces, that is, is not a "reference"? Let's look at an example.
Suppose we have a cylinder, a small ball rotates around the cylinder in a conditional, very strong and weightless sphere. If you create a slight shock wave behind the ball (explosion), then according to Newton's second law, the change in the speed of rotation of the ball should occur in proportion to the force acting on it (that is, the force of the explosion), and the movement should be directed along a straight line towards which the explosive force was attached.
What will happen in this particular example? Newton's second law does not differentiate directions into translational or rotational. Therefore, the rotational and translational movement of the cylinder should be considered equal to the force applied to the cylinder. It turns out that a body rotating around some object can transmit to this body a translational and rectilinear motion, the direction of which will coincide with the direction of the applied force.
So, the rectilinear and translational movement of one object can cause the energy that the work produces during the rotational movement of another object. The cylinder, in our example,has a large mass in relation to the ball. If this were not so, then the movement of the central axis of the cylinder would be equivalent to the movement of a rotating ball. However, examining our example, we can assume that such inertia has the right to exist, in which the force applied to the center of the cylinder will cause a rectilinear and translational movement in it.
Thus, the rotational movement of one object can cause a rectilinear and translational movement of another, and all three Newton's laws will not be violated.
Modern science has already reached the point where it is able to create a "supportless" engine that will use a continuous, closed and cyclical process of generating energy, which will create a rotational movement. This method of transportation can be used in any vehicle, from a bicycle to a flying saucer, and the cost-effectiveness of this process will be incomparable.
