Remember your school days. Yes, indeed, there are these typical phrases of teachers that they loved to use for their educational purposes. Many phrases took root and became widespread in the school environment. Some teachers' phrases are passed down from generation to generation. Probably, when future teachers were sitting at the school desk, they heard some of them addressed to them. So, let's remember the school years.
Forest of hands
A phrase with ironic overtones. The first part of this phrase is as follows: “Who to the blackboard? Forest of hands! Many of us experienced a heart attack during this question, some had time to pray, and optimists managed to learn the given material. The moment characterizing the superiority of the teacher over the students. When the teacher picks up a magazine and pronounces this frightening phrase so drawlingly. The final part of the phrase "Forest of hands!" no less remarkable: "Handno, just oaks. If this phrase was logically predictable, they were waiting for it at the beginning of the lesson, checking the material covered, then such phrases of teachers as, for example, “take out double sheets of paper”, “close textbooks” took us by surprise. They frightened us, and these were real life conditions, a test of knowledge, and I must say “thank you” for these “double leaves”, which then, years later, happened more than once in real life, when you didn’t expect them at all. The students waited with hope for that desperate hero who was supposed to "save the situation", and the teacher understood that now many heads could roll.
Diary is your face
Or another such related phrase: "The cover of a notebook, a book is your face." A diary is an important attribute in the life of any student, it will tell you everything about you: behavior, diligence, grades, recording homework. Yes, he was a face. He could tell a lot. In it you could see your fives and deuces, ups and downs. It was like a verdict: "The diary is your face!" And against this background, one more of the teachers’ favorite phrases comes to mind: “For now, I put a deuce with a pencil.” Remember? This meant that you still have a chance to correct the situation, because it is known that "what is written with a pen, you cannot cut it out with an ax." The inscription made with a pencil could be easily erased. Or, remember, they liked to put a dot in front of your last name. A deuce put in pencil is not only a chance for correction, but also the fact that your knowledge was called into question. There is such an expression as “put on a pencil”, that is, express your distrust, doubt. Schoolboyis under pressure, now he must prove himself and correct this "pencil deuce".
I look in the book - I see a figure
That is, in other words, not to understand, not to realize the meaning of what was read.
A phrase that is quite common not only in the school environment. But again, the phrase “I look in a book - I see a fig” is often used by teachers. The teacher once again uses his superiority over the students. But after all, far from always, not all teachers use ironic, unkind phrases, many of these phrases may have been uttered in a moment of “weakness”. Also, as an example, one can cite such phrases of teachers that begin with the words: “You must!” You must study well, be diligent, obedient, polite. And most importantly, you must obey the teacher in everything. Please note that this type of wording causes depression and stress, if such a wording is changed, leaving the meaning of what was said, then you can achieve a better result in raising school-age children. For example, if the phrase “you must obey the teacher” is formulated differently: “You can have your own opinion, but the opinion of the elders must be heeded.” Or a phrase like this:
- Where is Ivanov?
– Ill.
– Yes? What, perhaps, is the inflammation of cunning?!
Such treatment can often lead to misunderstanding and give rise to conflicts in the future. Vedas schoolchildren are well aware that much is forbidden for them, and adults "can do anything." But adults, in ourIn the case of teachers, appeals of this kind should be kept to a minimum. If you practice and replace the typical phrase: “I look in a book - I see a fig” for another, how would you say differently? If we stick to this scenario, then the picture looks different. A friendly and relaxed atmosphere reigns in the classroom, the teacher correctly directs the course of classes in the lesson. Classes arranged in this order are productive. And it is quite possible that the next time the teacher does a roll call in the classroom, the teacher will find a pleasant moment for himself that no one in the class is suffering from “inflammation of cunning” anymore.
Teacher Call
But I would like to argue with this phrase, since the time allocated for the lesson should be strictly distributed by the teacher, this is his “art” to be able to maneuver in this small time interval. Every teacher understands how the attention of the children weakens after the bell. Again, there is a demonstration of strength: “Sit down! Call for the teacher! But I would like to note that strictness, even if a little superfluous, still does not hurt anyone. From time to time, this form of communication is acceptable; moreover, it characterizes the teacher as a teacher who can easily get in touch with students. The use of such phrases suggests that not everything is in the field of his attention. Classes may not always achieve their goal.
Two plus three. Evaluation for two
Using this phrase, the teacher implies that he hears a promptstudents, and in a rather tolerant, one might even say loyal, form, he gives a warning on his part. "Ivanov, what's going on there? Estimate also for two? Appeal of this kind rather indicates the absence of a communication barrier. Yes, of course, there is an educational influence on the part of the teacher, but the audience in the class is not passive, the teacher's behavior is not dominant. Such a situation of such active interaction can easily be corrected and called "union". There is no inflexible response, the teacher does not resemble a "robot", even if some authoritarianism of the "I myself" type will manifest itself to a small extent, but you cannot call such a situation non-contact.
Did you forget your head at home?
Forgot my sports uniform, forgot my notebook, textbook and the like… Did you “forget”? The teacher's phrase is full of irony. A deaf "Chinese wall" of misunderstanding has been erected between you. The statement of teachers in this form humiliates and oppresses the student, makes him a vulnerable object of ridicule from his classmates. The style of such communication is likened to an incorrect and non-contact model of communication between a teacher and students. This is really very, very bad in relation to the student. In such a situation, the "Chinese wall" can lead to the emergence of a barrier, the situation is characterized by weak feedback between the two parties, the lack of desire to contact and cooperate on the part of the students. The teacher involuntarily emphasizes his status and his condescending attitude towards students, which will lead to indifferent attitude on the part of schoolchildren.
A bit of psychology
But there are situations when the teacher focuses on some part of the class, but not on the whole audience. For example, his attention is squandered only on talented students, or, conversely, on the link of outsiders. Or here is a situation where the teacher is focused only on himself, listens only to himself, his speech is monotonous and monotonous. In such a “dialogue” it is impossible for the opponent to insert his remark, emotional deafness to the students around him is the main obstacle. Both sides of the learning process become isolated from each other. There are situations completely opposite to those described above, for example, the teacher is concerned about how he is perceived by others, questions his actions and methods, depends on the mood in the audience, reacts sharply to all remarks in the class, taking them personally. In this case, the reins of government are in the hands of the students, and the teacher takes a leading position. And what can such a situation lead to? It's better to listen to these typical teacher phrases than total anarchy in the classroom.
Golden mean
How to determine the very "golden mean" when the learning process focuses on the teacher, the teacher is the main character, but, in addition, he must be in constant dialogue with the students. Questions and answers, judgments and strong arguments come from the teacher, and on the other hand, he should encourage initiative and easily grasp the psychological climate in the classroom. This form of communication is most productive when the friendly style prevails.interaction, but the role distance is maintained.
Conclusion. Outcome
In conclusion, summing up what has been said, I would like to note that a teacher is a difficult profession that requires great patience and attention to children. After all, not everyone can be a teacher, this is a special calling. In order to pass on your knowledge to the younger generation, you need a certain talent. Of course, it is very difficult, and sometimes quite difficult, to instruct and educate children, but we will always remember our teachers. After all, thanks to the perseverance, work and optimism of the teacher, “masterpieces” can appear. But in order for such a “masterpiece” to appear, you need to disinterestedly love children and selflessly give yourself to them!
