Rational decisions: definition, meaning and decision steps

Table of contents:

Rational decisions: definition, meaning and decision steps
Rational decisions: definition, meaning and decision steps

Rational decision making is very cool and interesting. Read our complete productivity guide here for more productivity tips. But before we explore each step of this powerful process, let's look at what rational decision making is and why it's important.

Decision making issue


To pinpoint your specific problem, gather as much data as you can in the right area and analyze it to find any worrying patterns or trends.

Example: "After analyzing our blog traffic report, we now know why it has plummeted in recent years: our organic traffic is up slightly from the previous month, while email and social are down."

Other solutions

Potential solution: "We could focus solely on growing email traffic: iteasier than growing social and organic at the same time. We also have 250,000 blog subscribers, so we could publish our posts to many readers."

Rational Factors

Potential Outcome 1: "Increasing email traffic by sending two emails a day to our blog subscribers is challenging because we already send one email to subscribers daily and the channel only accounts for 15% of our blog traffic. Focusing on email will give minimal results." Rational problem solving isvery important. No company can operate without them. In the same way, without this ability, no person can exist, because this is a key success of our consciousness, which cannot be denied. In the future, throughout the article, you will find real examples of how important and interesting this is. Without this, it is impossible to build a business. Thinking rationally is not only useful and necessary, but also in some way pleasant. This can be confirmed by anyone who is either a professional design maker or just leads a very balanced life.

Potential Outcome 2: "Increasing organic traffic by targeting high search volume keywords for all of our new posts is the easiest way to increase our overall blog traffic. We have high domain authority, Google uses 80% our total traffic, and we just implemented the pillar cluster model.organic would give the most results."

Solution and results

Example: "After a month of testing, our blog traffic grew by 14% and organic by 21%."

Important examples

People associate the same personality traits with brands as with people: choosing a favorite brand is choosing a best friend or other person. We go with an option that makes us feel something. Solving rational inequalities is the best way to study phenomena like brand popularity, changing customer needs, and so on.

stages of acceptance

Why is everything like this?

The rational planning model is used in the planning and design of neighborhoods, cities and regions. She was central to the development of modern urban and transport planning. The model has many limitations, in particular the lack of guidance on engaging stakeholders and the community affected by the planning. Other scheduling models such as participatory scheduling are now widely used as well. Solving rational equations (grade 8) is a very popular method at school.

Other models

A very similar model of rational decision making, as it is called in organizational behavior, is a very interesting process. A significant part of this article is devoted to him. In essence, it consists in making logically sound decisions. It is a multi-step model that aims to be logical and followordered path. Rational decision making is a multi-step path to logically informed choices.

The first step is to check, define and detail the problem (problem definition, goal definition, information gathering). It involves recognizing a problem, choosing an initial solution, and running an initial analysis. Examples of this are creative developments and ideas, inspiration, breakthroughs and brainstorming sessions.

Management decisions

The very first step, which is usually overlooked by senior management, is identifying the exact problem. Although it is believed that identifying a problem is obvious, in many cases this is not the case. The rational decision model is a group based decision making process. If the problem is not properly identified, then difficulties can be encountered, since each member of the group may have a different definition of it.

This step includes two or three final solutions to the problem and a preliminary implementation of the site. In planning, examples of this are development and revitalization plan units in the city center.

This exercise is best done in groups, as different people may come up with different ideas or alternative solutions. Without them, there is a chance to arrive at a suboptimal or rational solution. Information needs to be collected to explore alternatives. Technology can help harvest it.

Theory of decisions

Evaluation criteria are measures for determining the success and failure of alternatives. This step contains secondary andfinal analysis, as well as secondary solutions to the problem. Examples of this are site suitability and site sensitivity analysis. After carefully going through the process of identifying the problem, examining all possible alternatives to the problem, and gathering information, this step suggests evaluating the information and options in order to anticipate the consequences of each possible alternative in question. At this stage, optional criteria for measuring the success or failure of the decision made should be considered. A rational planning model relies mainly on objective evaluation.

Based on the evaluation criteria and analysis carried out in the previous steps, the best generated solution is selected. These four steps form the core of the Rational Decision Decision Model, which is based on rational decision processes.

This stage includes the final implementation of the site and preliminary monitoring of the results. This step is part of the construction/renovation process and contains secondary and final monitoring of results. It occurs over a long period of time and allows changes to be made to future decisions and actions taken based on the above evaluation of results. This is the rational solution.

Some criteria, such as economic benefit, will be easier to measure or define, while others, such as environmental quality, will be more difficult to quantify. Ultimately, however, the set of decision criteria must include all policy objectives, and reassessment of more easily defined ormeasurable criteria would have the undesirable effect of biasing analysis towards a subset of policy objectives.

The process of defining a reasonably comprehensive set of decision criteria is also subject to skew due to pressures on political engagement. For example, decision makers may tend to give more weight to political impacts that are concentrated, tangible, definite, and immediate than impacts that are diffuse, intangible, uncertain, and delayed. For example, with a cap-and-trade system, the net financial cost in the first five years of policy implementation is much easier to conceptualize than the more diffuse and uncertain impact of a country's improved position in influencing global negotiations on climate change action.


Mapping the impact of policy alternatives can be done using the Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). PAM provides a summary of policy impacts for various alternatives, and analysis of the matrix can reveal the trade-offs associated with this. Rational management decision is very important.

Once the policy alternatives have been evaluated, the next step is to decide which policy alternative should be implemented. At one extreme, comparing policy alternatives can be relatively easy if all policy objectives can be measured using the same indicator and with the same weight. In this case, the methoddecision making is Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA).

On the other hand, multiple goals will require expressing policy impacts using different metrics that are difficult to compare. In such cases, the political analyst may draw on the concept of utility to combine different goals into a single assessment. Under the concept of utility, each impact is given a weight such that one unit of each weighted impact is considered equally valuable (or desirable) in terms of collective welfare.

Wymer and Vining also suggest that the "go, don't go" rule may be a useful method for choosing among policy alternatives. Under this decision mode, some or all of the policy impacts can be assigned thresholds that are used to eliminate at least some of the policy alternatives. Thus, any policy alternative that does not meet this threshold may be excluded from consideration. If only one policy alternative satisfies all impact thresholds, then that is considered the "move" for each impact. Otherwise, it may happen that all but a few political alternatives are excluded, and those that remain must be more carefully examined in terms of their trade-offs so that a decision can be made.

Decision-making methods


To demonstrate the process of rational analysis, howdescribed above, let's take a look at the policy paper "Promoting Biofuels in the European Union: Implications for Climate Change Policy" by Lisa Ryan, where the European Union proposed replacing fossil fuels with biofuels in the period 2005-2010 as part of a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from road transport, improving energy security and supporting the development of rural communities. The rational decision method is very advanced and is used in almost all areas of life.

However, there are many assumptions, requirements, without which a rational decision-making model fails. Therefore, all of them must be considered. The model assumes that we either have, or should, or can obtain adequate information in terms of quality, quantity, and accuracy. This applies both to the main situation and to alternative technical ones. The following assumes that you either have, or should, or can acquire substantial knowledge of causal relationships relevant to the evaluation of alternatives. In other words, it assumes that you are well aware of all the alternatives and the consequences of the choices you make. The following assumes that you can rank them and pick the best one. Solving rational fractional numbers is a popular method in mathematics.

Fork in the road

While the rational planning model was innovative in concept, the concepts themselves are now controversial and questionable processes. Rational modelplanning has gone out of mainstream use in the last decade. Lucy Suchman argues that instead of conceptualizing human agents as rational planners, they can be better understood as being involved in actions on the spot. Going further, Guy Benveniste argued that a rational model cannot be implemented without taking into account the political context. Rational problem solving is an important and interesting task.

Other models

Rational decision making models involve a cognitive process where each step follows in a logical order from the previous one. By cognitive, I mean that it is based on thinking through and weighing alternatives to get the best potential outcome.

There are different types of rational models, and the number of steps used and even the steps themselves will differ between models.

Some people assume that making decisions is equivalent to solving problems. Some solutions, however, are not problem-oriented.

Comparison is often done by filling out forms or charts that have many names. Decision matrix, Pew matrix, selection matrix, criteria rating form and others. Relative importance is given to each criterion, and options are evaluated for each criterion and the largest "wins". Solving fractional rational inequalities is very popular in mathematics.

The rational decision model assumes that there is one best outcome. Because of this, it is sometimes called an optimizing decision model. Search for perfectionoften a factor in the actual decision delay.

This model also assumes that each option can be considered, as well as the future consequences of each. While many would like to think they know what will happen, the universe often has other plans.

This is also limited by the cognitive ability of the decision maker. How good is their memory? How good is their fantasy? The criteria themselves will, of course, be subjective and difficult to compare. These models require a lot of time and a lot of information. And, of course, a rational decision-making model tries to negate the role of emotions in the process.

Decision makers are said to exhibit bounded rationality when they consider fewer options than are actually available, or when they choose an option that is not the best overall but the best under current conditions. For example, someone spills coffee on a shirt in a restaurant, goes to a neighborhood store and buys an ill-fitting shirt to change immediately. In this respect, the solution of rational inequalities is very effective.

Obviously, it would be optimal to buy a matching shirt. But if a person is in a hurry and cannot wear wet, coffee-stained clothes, then it is appropriate to buy ill-fitting clothes as well. This is called a satisfactory way of rational decision.

When you think about it, most of our decisions are, in part, because we save time by not considering every opportunity available to us. We select only the mostuseful. Rational examples with solutions are also popular in schools because they are very useful.


This model was originally created by Vroom and Yetton in 1973 and later modified by Vroom and Iago. Basically, there are five situations for decision making, from a single decision maker, to a person with varying amounts of information compared to the rest of the group, to the entire group.

The Vroom-Jago Decision Model contains a series of seven yes/no questions that identify important criteria and indicate which of the five decision processes is most appropriate.


Decision making is a very important process in every sense of the word. Without it, the existence of a modern political and social reaction is impossible, because the volitional core of a person strives for its total expression through the matrix of making a choice. In computer science, mathematics and mixed fields, however, a somewhat different phenomenon is called this phrase, and the article is devoted to this meaning. It is very important to understand and realize this for everyone who reads it, especially for people who are going to often make rational decisions, the methods and features of which are very diverse. This can be seen from the information presented in the article.

It is also very important to understand how important decisions are. In modern companies, a huge responsibility lies precisely on the design makers, who determine a significant part of the activities of media holdings. Because this topic is so interestingto all young and ambitious professionals.

Examples with rational numbers, the solution of which plays a big role in physics and natural sciences, were compiled precisely thanks to the study of the topic that this article is devoted to.

Popular topic