A review is a specialized document that contains an assessment of the final work. If it is not attached to the thesis, the commission will not allow you to defend. Accordingly, peer review is the process of studying scientific work by scientists of a certain field. This document is compiled by a person who is called a reviewer.
Who is a reviewer
Review of the final work is written by a specialist you choose yourself. The only condition is that he should not work in the same department as your immediate supervisor. When defending a thesis, the commission will definitely evaluate if your reviewer has an academic degree (he will be a candidate or doctor of science).
As a rule, in the final study, calculations are made on the basis of data from the enterprise where the student underwent undergraduate practice. As such, the reviewer is often the practice leader.
If you are lucky, a specialist wrote a review of your work, certified it with a signature and a seal, then you will take the finished document and attach it to the thesis. However, practice showsthat most often it is compiled by the student himself, after which he comes with her to the personnel department to supply the necessary details. Therefore, it is necessary to know how to write a review of a thesis so that the graduation committee does not have questions about the quality of the document.
What is a review
Reviewing is the process of writing a review of a thesis. The document received should contain the following information:
- Analysis of all sections of the thesis.
- The degree of compliance of the project with all regulatory requirements.
- Virtues of work.
- Flaws of the study.
To get the highest grade for the thesis, the review of the thesis project must give the commission the most favorable impression of your research.
How to write a thesis review
Reviewing is not a difficult task for a student who has written his/her graduation paper on his/her own. You probably know the strengths and weaknesses of your research, so you can highlight the strengths and hide the weaknesses.
A good tip to help you write a quality review is to avoid generalities. That is, you should not write: “Very good work”, “The author proved to be an excellent specialist”, etc.
The review consists of the following sections:
- Introduction is an assessment of the relevance of the study.
- Mainpart - assessment of the merits, shortcomings of the study, feedback on each section of the work. This information usually takes up most of the document.
- The final part is the conclusion about whether the student should be allowed to defend his thesis. This section is usually the shortest.
There are also certain regulatory requirements, according to which a review must be issued.
Regulatory content requirements
Review is a process that requires precision. Therefore, there are aspects that must be observed regardless of the content of the document. These include:
- The volume of the document should not exceed 2 sheets of A-4 format.
- The word "review" should be written in capital letters in the center of the page.
- It is necessary to indicate the topic of the thesis, the full name of the student, the number of his faculty and group.
- Evaluation of the relevance of the thesis must be present in the review.
- The ability of the author to think logically and draw competent conclusions should be assessed.
- It is necessary to assess the proportionality of the sections of the thesis.
- The review should contain information about applications, diagrams, drawings and illustrations for the thesis.
- Information should be provided on the extent to which the student has the skills of presenting the text in a scientific style.
- Do not forget to provide information on how the final research can be applied in practicalactivities.
- It is necessary to indicate significant and minor shortcomings of the work.
- The document must contain the name and initials of the reviewer, his scientific degree, profession, signature and seal of the organization.
The commission always checks whether the work meets these requirements.
Helpful tips
Remember that in any work there must be flaws. It is better to indicate them in the review than the commission will reveal them during the study of your project. Also, if you are aware of a significant research omission and don't want to write about it, then point out a few minor omissions, as all attention will be focused on them.
After writing a review, proofread the entire text the next day to find flaws that went unnoticed earlier and quickly fix them.
