Due to the natural desire to work less and rest more, mankind has invented a lot of useful things in the household. But sometimes, human nature takes its toll and pushes for incredible deeds. And then others can say: “Yes, the guy is just unrestrained!” - that would be a good feature. Is it just positive or negative? How good is it to have such a personality trait?
Demonstrative etymology
Native speakers don't need to study dictionaries for a long time to get to the bottom of the definition. Morphemes literally lie on the surface:
- -hold- - the root, which means stiffness in movement;
- y- is a prefix that indicates an attempt to prevent something;
- without- is a prefix with a negative meaning.
And together it turns out: the concept is characteristic of what or whom is not able to keep. More specifically?
Unbridled desire
We are talking about all possible phenomena. It is very easy to realize what it is - unrestrained, using the example of synonyms. And there are a great many of them, depending on the context:
- Homeric;
- frantic;
- reckless;
- crazy;
- indomitable;
- rebellious;
- frantic etc.
When talking about natural phenomena or human emotions, they mean that no force is able to interrupt them. Some were amused by the joke, and they laugh non-stop, others look in horror at the storm that broke out and understand that the flimsy walls of the wooden house will not interfere with it.
In the first sense, this definition indicates the absence of frames, boundaries, the slightest protection for others. The second meaning fixes the concept directly in people. Such a character is both a positive and a bad trait. Why is this happening?
Polar opinions
The term under study can be used in conjunction with the words "generosity" and "kindness". Such an unrestrained person gladly gives joy to relatives, friends, colleagues and random passers-by. She pays bills at restaurants, orders expensive souvenirs, pays more attention to the needs of others than her own. On the other hand, is it possible to call such behavior wastefulness, carelessness?
Paired with the words "rage" and "anger", a very sad picture will come out. Such an epithet is awarded to people who are as rude and intolerant as possible, whose society is harmful to the entire society, violates moral and ethical principles, and often crosses the lines of both etiquette and law.
Appropriate usage
Speak or not? "Unrestrained" is a neutral term with a poeticcoloring. It gives any phrase a certain dreaminess, as if elevating the speaker above the world. Its interpretation depends entirely on the object to which the adjective is paired. And yet it is better to know the measure, so that relatives do not take offense, and noble impulses do not turn into their opposite!
