Sometimes it is easier to think over, prepare and conduct two open classes in a row than to analyze your own lesson. You sit down in front of a computer monitor or a sheet of paper and… you get the feeling that you are a centipede who was asked which of the legs will take the first step.
In fact, everything is simple: you need to think not about which foot you start walking with, but about where you eventually need to go, and how to do it. The main thing is to have a plan in front of your eyes. For clarity, we analyze a specific subject from the school curriculum. Let's conduct, for example, self-analysis of the Russian language lesson.
The role of introspection in the work of a teacher
Introspection is working on mistakes and at the same time planning your actions for a long period. For example, after studying the topic "Determinative pronouns", the students wrote a test. The results were worse than expected. Why? The answer helps to find self-examinationlesson. The Russian language is a complex subject. Perhaps, to achieve better results, it is worth finding other forms of work with students? A teacher who cannot analyze his reflective activity, comprehend what he did in the lesson, is unlikely to be able to arrange his work so that it meets the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard.
Introspection of the lesson allows you to:
- It is correct to formulate the goals of the activities of the teacher and students.
- See the relationship between what needs to be achieved and how it can be done.
- Clearly plan and achieve results in teaching activities.
- Motivate students to gain knowledge, for an excellent end result.
Scheme of introspection of the lesson of the Russian language
This scheme is suitable for self-assessment of any subject
1. General characteristics of the class, which includes analysis in percentage terms:
- general student development;
- Knowledge of students in the Russian language;
- personal development.
2. The relationship of the studied material with the previously covered material.
3. Description of the objectives of the lesson:
- educational;
- educational;
- developing.
4. Lesson plan. Feature:
- learning material to be covered in the lesson;
- teaching methods;
- teaching techniques;
- forms of organizing students' activities.
5. Analysis of the stages of the lesson. How Useddid pedagogical and didactic techniques affect the students' assimilation of the studied material?
6. Analysis of lesson components:
- expediency;
- ultimate performance.
7. Functionality:
- is the chosen lesson structure justified;
- does the level of tasks correspond to the general level of the class;
- analysis of the quality of the relationship between class and teacher.
8. End result score:
- determining how the planned goal was achieved in the lesson;
- if not achieved, why did it happen;
- output.
The plan of self-analysis of the lesson of the Russian language will be carried out according to the same scheme.
Requirements for self-review of the lesson
Teachers are used to analyzing work - this is part of their function. But here's how to analyze with maximum objectivity what he did himself, how to correctly arrange the self-analysis of the lesson (Russian language) according to the Federal State Educational Standard? Indeed, with a formal approach, this responsible occupation will be absolutely meaningless. Therefore, you need to know the requirements put forward by the Federal State Educational Standard and adhere to the algorithm below.
Analysis of the children's team
A preliminary study of the following issues related to the personal characteristics and skills of the children's team involves introspection of the lesson. The Russian language is one of the basic subjects, so its successful assimilation is especially important.
- Level of preparation of the class: the ability to interact with each other in work and in communication, the ability to evaluate the results of their work and the work of classmates.
- What type of communication prevails in the student team? Compete or interact? Are there leaders?
- How motivated is the team to get new knowledge of the Russian language and to study successfully?
- The average level of mastering the educational material in the subject by the class.
Questions to analyze the effectiveness of the didactic methods used in the lesson
The most important factor in quality introspection is an objective assessment of the effectiveness of the methods you have chosen for working in the lesson, the tactics of conducting the lesson. If you ask yourself the questions below and answer them candidly, the self-analysis of the lesson (Russian) will be completed in full.
- How was the work organized in the Russian language lesson?
- What was planned for the study, how significant is the topic?
- How deep do you know this topic?
- Concepts learned in the lesson: are they related to the previous ones and to what extent?
- How strong is the connection between what has been learned and what will be explained to the class in the next lessons?
- How deeply do students know the previous material that is important for understanding the studied topic?
- How did the students study the material?
- How was it planned to introduce students to the topic and how well did they learn it?
- Are all the planned stages of the trainingprocesses have been implemented and how successful?
- Were there moments in the lesson when the students had difficulty understanding the material, what they were doing? If yes, how deep?
- Were all the learning criteria satisfactory?
- Output.
Analysis of the lesson process
Another essential ingredient when you are introspecting a lesson. The Russian language is an unpredictable subject, as situations often arise in the lesson that cannot be planned in advance. In this case, the whole harmonious plan, thought out, verified until the last second of the study time, can go down the drain.
Therefore, the next block of questions to be answered relates to the lesson.
- How are the purpose of the lesson and its final result correlated, did everyone manage to do it?
- Did you manage to establish a dialogue "teacher - students"?
- Did you manage to create a situation of success at the beginning of the session?
- How was the students' attention drawn to the new topic?
- How is knowledge updated?
- Did the students understand the learning task assigned to them?
- To what extent have the tasks been completed?
- Have there been unplanned situations, have you managed to solve them in terms of the topic being studied?
- What forms of knowledge control were used in the lesson? Were they justified in this lesson?
- Was the lesson cohesive?
- Did it meet the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard, to what extent?
- What was the level of intra-class interaction during the lesson?
- Select the weakest and strongest stages of the lesson.
Conclusion
The teaching profession is very responsible. Many lines have been written about the honorary pedagogical mission and responsibility: solemn, official, sublime. Therefore, I just want to wish them students who will surpass their teachers. Indeed, for a true mentor, the biggest reward and sign of pedagogical talent is successful students.
